Apparatus and method for contingent assignment actions

ABSTRACT

An apparatus and method for contingent assignment actions is disclosed. The apparatus includes a processor and a memory communicatively connected to the processor. The processor receives assignment data. An assignment is assigned to a user. The processor generates a contingent action. The processor receives a cryptographic proof. The cryptographic proof is validated. The contingent action is executed by the processor, conditionally, based on the validation of the cryptographic proof.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to the field of contingent actions. In particular, the present invention is directed to an apparatus and method for contingent assignment actions.

BACKGROUND

Some actions are contingent upon other actions. There is a need for an apparatus and method that may execute conditional actions on a schedule.

SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

In an aspect an apparatus for contingent assignment actions includes at least a processor, and a memory communicatively connected to the at least a processor, the memory containing instructions configuring the at least a processor to: identify assignment data, wherein the assignment data represents an assignment, assign the assignment to a user, generate a contingent action as a function of the assignment data, receive a cryptographic proof of a pairing of the assignment with a completion datum, validate the cryptographic proof, and execute the contingent action as a function of the validated cryptographic proof.

In another aspect a method for contingent assignment actions includes identifying, by a processor, assignment data, wherein the assignment data represents an assignment, assigning, by the processor, the assignment to a user, generating, by the processor, a contingent action as a function of the assignment data, wherein the contingent action is contingent on a proof validation, receiving, by the processor, a cryptographic proof of a pairing of the assignment with a completion datum, validating, by the processor, the cryptographic proof, and executing, by the processor, the contingent action as a function of the validated cryptographic proof.

These and other aspects and features of non-limiting embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon review of the following description of specific non-limiting embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For the purpose of illustrating the invention, the drawings show aspects of one or more embodiments of the invention. However, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an apparatus for contingent assignment actions;

FIG. 2 is an exemplary embodiment of an immutable sequential listing;

FIG. 3 is an exemplary embodiment of a neural network;

FIG. 4 is an exemplary embodiment of a node of a neural network;

FIG. 5 is an exemplary embodiment of a machine-learning module;

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of a method for contingent assignment actions; and

FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a computing system that can be used to implement any one or more of the methodologies disclosed herein and any one or more portions thereof.

The drawings are not necessarily to scale and may be illustrated by phantom lines, diagrammatic representations and fragmentary views. In certain instances, details that are not necessary for an understanding of the embodiments or that render other details difficult to perceive may have been omitted.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

At a high level, aspects of the present disclosure are directed apparatus and method for contingent assignment actions. In an embodiment, actions may be contingent upon completion of an assignment. Aspects of the present disclosure can be used to schedule actions. Aspects of the present disclosure can also be used to validate the completion of an action. Exemplary embodiments illustrating aspects of the present disclosure are described below in the context of several specific examples.

In an embodiment, methods and apparatus described herein may perform implement one or more aspects of a cryptographic system. In one embodiment, a cryptographic system is a system that converts data from a first form, known as “plaintext,” which is intelligible when viewed in its intended format, into a second form, known as “cyphertext,” which is not intelligible when viewed in the same way. Cyphertext may be unintelligible in any format unless first converted back to plaintext. In one embodiment, a process of converting plaintext into cyphertext is known as “encryption.” Encryption may involve the use of a datum, known as an “encryption key,” to alter plaintext. Cryptographic system may also convert cyphertext back into plaintext, which is a process known as “decryption.” Decryption process may involve the use of a datum, known as a “decryption key,” to return the cyphertext to its original plaintext form. In embodiments of cryptographic systems that are “symmetric,” decryption key is essentially the same as encryption key: possession of either key makes it possible to deduce the other key quickly without further secret knowledge. Encryption and decryption keys in symmetric cryptographic systems may be kept secret and shared only with persons or entities that the user of the cryptographic system wishes to be able to decrypt the cyphertext. One example of a symmetric cryptographic system is the Advanced Encryption Standard (“AES”), which arranges plaintext into matrices and then modifies the matrices through repeated permutations and arithmetic operations with an encryption key.

In embodiments of cryptographic systems that are “asymmetric,” either encryption or decryption key cannot be readily deduced without additional secret knowledge, even given the possession of a corresponding decryption or encryption key, respectively; a common example is a “public key cryptographic system,” in which possession of the encryption key does not make it practically feasible to deduce the decryption key, so that the encryption key may safely be made available to the public. An example of a public key cryptographic system is RSA, in which an encryption key involves the use of numbers that are products of very large prime numbers, but a decryption key involves the use of those very large prime numbers, such that deducing the decryption key from the encryption key requires the practically infeasible task of computing the prime factors of a number which is the product of two very large prime numbers. A further example of an asymmetric cryptographic system may include a discrete-logarithm based system based upon the relative ease of computing exponents mod a large integer, and the computational infeasibility of determining the discrete logarithm of resulting numbers absent previous knowledge of the exponentiations; an example of such a system may include Diffie-Hellman key exchange and/or public key encryption. Another example is elliptic curve cryptography, which relies on the fact that given two points P and Q on an elliptic curve over a finite field, a definition of the inverse of a point −A as the point with negative y-coordinates, and a definition for addition where A+B=−R, the point where a line connecting point A and point B intersects the elliptic curve, where “0,” the identity, is a point at infinity in a projective plane containing the elliptic curve, finding a number k such that adding P to itself k times results in Q is computationally impractical, given correctly selected elliptic curve, finite field, and P and Q. A further example of asymmetrical cryptography may include lattice-based cryptography, which relies on the fact that various properties of sets of integer combination of basis vectors are hard to compute, such as finding the one combination of basis vectors that results in the smallest Euclidean distance. Embodiments of cryptography, whether symmetrical or asymmetrical, may include quantum-secure cryptography, defined for the purposes of this disclosure as cryptography that remains secure against adversaries possessing quantum computers; some forms of lattice-based cryptography, for instance, may be quantum-secure.

In some embodiments, apparatus and methods described herein produce cryptographic hashes, also referred to by the equivalent shorthand term “hashes.” A cryptographic hash, as used herein, is a mathematical representation of a lot of data, such as files or blocks in a block chain as described in further detail below; the mathematical representation is produced by a lossy “one-way” algorithm known as a “hashing algorithm.” Hashing algorithm may be a repeatable process; that is, identical lots of data may produce identical hashes each time they are subjected to a particular hashing algorithm. Because hashing algorithm is a one-way function, it may be impossible to reconstruct a lot of data from a hash produced from the lot of data using the hashing algorithm. In the case of some hashing algorithms, reconstructing the full lot of data from the corresponding hash using a partial set of data from the full lot of data may be possible only by repeatedly guessing at the remaining data and repeating the hashing algorithm; it is thus computationally difficult if not infeasible for a single computer to produce the lot of data, as the statistical likelihood of correctly guessing the missing data may be extremely low. However, the statistical likelihood of a computer of a set of computers simultaneously attempting to guess the missing data within a useful timeframe may be higher, permitting mining protocols as described in further detail below.

In an embodiment, hashing algorithm may demonstrate an “avalanche effect,” whereby even extremely small changes to lot of data produce drastically different hashes. This may thwart attempts to avoid the computational work necessary to recreate a hash by simply inserting a fraudulent datum in data lot, enabling the use of hashing algorithms for “tamper-proofing” data such as data contained in an immutable ledger as described in further detail below. This avalanche or “cascade” effect may be evinced by various hashing processes; persons skilled in the art, upon reading the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various suitable hashing algorithms for purposes described herein. Verification of a hash corresponding to a lot of data may be performed by running the lot of data through a hashing algorithm used to produce the hash. Such verification may be computationally expensive, albeit feasible, potentially adding up to significant processing delays where repeated hashing, or hashing of large quantities of data, is required, for instance as described in further detail below. Examples of hashing programs include, without limitation, SHA256, a NIST standard; further current and past hashing algorithms include Winternitz hashing algorithms, various generations of Secure Hash Algorithm (including “SHA-1,” “SHA-2,” and “SHA-3”), “Message Digest” family hashes such as “MD4,” “MD5,” “MD6,” and “RIPEMD,” Keccak, “BLAKE” hashes and progeny (e.g., “BLAKE2,” “BLAKE-256,” “BLAKE-512,” and the like), Message Authentication Code (“MAC”)-family hash functions such as PMAC, OMAC, VMAC, HMAC, and UMAC, Polyl305-AES, Elliptic Curve Only Hash (“ECOH”) and similar hash functions, Fast-Syndrome-based (FSB) hash functions, GOST hash functions, the Grøstl hash function, the HAS-160 hash function, the JH hash function, the RadioGatún hash function, the Skein hash function, the Streebog hash function, the SWIFFT hash function, the Tiger hash function, the Whirlpool hash function, or any hash function that satisfies, at the time of implementation, the requirements that a cryptographic hash be deterministic, infeasible to reverse-hash, infeasible to find collisions, and have the property that small changes to an original message to be hashed will change the resulting hash so extensively that the original hash and the new hash appear uncorrelated to each other. A degree of security of a hash function in practice may depend both on the hash function itself and on characteristics of the message and/or digest used in the hash function. For example, where a message is random, for a hash function that fulfills collision-resistance requirements, a brute-force or “birthday attack” may to detect collision may be on the order of O(2^(n/2)) for n output bits; thus, it may take on the order of 2²⁵⁶ operations to locate a collision in a 512 bit output “Dictionary” attacks on hashes likely to have been generated from a non-random original text can have a lower computational complexity, because the space of entries they are guessing is far smaller than the space containing all random permutations of bits. However, the space of possible messages may be augmented by increasing the length or potential length of a possible message, or by implementing a protocol whereby one or more randomly selected strings or sets of data are added to the message, rendering a dictionary attack significantly less effective.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 1 , a “secure proof,” as used in this disclosure, is a protocol whereby an output is generated that demonstrates possession of a secret, such as device-specific secret, without demonstrating the entirety of the device-specific secret; in other words, a secure proof by itself, is insufficient to reconstruct the entire device-specific secret, enabling the production of at least another secure proof using at least a device-specific secret. A secure proof may be referred to as a “proof of possession” or “proof of knowledge” of a secret. Where at least a device-specific secret is a plurality of secrets, such as a plurality of challenge-response pairs, a secure proof may include an output that reveals the entirety of one of the plurality of secrets, but not all of the plurality of secrets; for instance, secure proof may be a response contained in one challenge-response pair. In an embodiment, proof may not be secure; in other words, proof may include a one-time revelation of at least a device-specific secret, for instance as used in a single challenge-response exchange.

Secure proof may include a zero-knowledge proof, which may provide an output demonstrating possession of a secret while revealing none of the secret to a recipient of the output; zero-knowledge proof may be information-theoretically secure, meaning that an entity with infinite computing power would be unable to determine secret from output. Alternatively, zero-knowledge proof may be computationally secure, meaning that determination of secret from output is computationally infeasible, for instance to the same extent that determination of a private key from a public key in a public key cryptographic system is computationally infeasible. Zero-knowledge proof algorithms may generally include a set of two algorithms, a prover algorithm, or “P,” which is used to prove computational integrity and/or possession of a secret, and a verifier algorithm, or “V” whereby a party may check the validity of P. Zero-knowledge proof may include an interactive zero-knowledge proof, wherein a party verifying the proof must directly interact with the proving party; for instance, the verifying and proving parties may be required to be online, or connected to the same network as each other, at the same time. Interactive zero-knowledge proof may include a “proof of knowledge” proof, such as a Schnorr algorithm for proof on knowledge of a discrete logarithm. in a Schnorr algorithm, a prover commits to a randomness r, generates a message based on r, and generates a message adding r to a challenge c multiplied by a discrete logarithm that the prover is able to calculate; verification is performed by the verifier who produced c by exponentiation, thus checking the validity of the discrete logarithm. Interactive zero-knowledge proofs may alternatively or additionally include sigma protocols. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various alternative interactive zero-knowledge proofs that may be implemented consistently with this disclosure.

Alternatively, zero-knowledge proof may include a non-interactive zero-knowledge, proof, or a proof wherein neither party to the proof interacts with the other party to the proof; for instance, each of a party receiving the proof and a party providing the proof may receive a reference datum which the party providing the proof may modify or otherwise use to perform the proof. As a non-limiting example, zero-knowledge proof may include a succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (ZK-SNARKS) proof, wherein a “trusted setup” process creates proof and verification keys using secret (and subsequently discarded) information encoded using a public key cryptographic system, a prover runs a proving algorithm using the proving key and secret information available to the prover, and a verifier checks the proof using the verification key; public key cryptographic system may include RSA, elliptic curve cryptography, ElGamal, or any other suitable public key cryptographic system. Generation of trusted setup may be performed using a secure multiparty computation so that no one party has control of the totality of the secret information used in the trusted setup; as a result, if any one party generating the trusted setup is trustworthy, the secret information may be unrecoverable by malicious parties. As another non-limiting example, non-interactive zero-knowledge proof may include a Succinct Transparent Arguments of Knowledge (ZK-STARKS) zero-knowledge proof. In an embodiment, a ZK-STARKS proof includes a Merkle root of a Merkle tree representing evaluation of a secret computation at some number of points, which may be 1 billion points, plus Merkle branches representing evaluations at a set of randomly selected points of the number of points; verification may include determining that Merkle branches provided match the Merkle root, and that point verifications at those branches represent valid values, where validity is shown by demonstrating that all values belong to the same polynomial created by transforming the secret computation. In an embodiment, ZK-STARKS does not require a trusted setup.

Zero-knowledge proof may include any other suitable zero-knowledge proof. Zero-knowledge proof may include, without limitation bulletproofs. Zero-knowledge proof may include a homomorphic public-key cryptography (hPKC)-based proof. Zero-knowledge proof may include a discrete logarithmic problem (DLP) proof. Zero-knowledge proof may include a secure multi-party computation (MPC) proof. Zero-knowledge proof may include, without limitation, an incrementally verifiable computation (IVC). Zero-knowledge proof may include an interactive oracle proof (IOP). Zero-knowledge proof may include a proof based on the probabilistically checkable proof (PCP) theorem, including a linear PCP (LPCP) proof. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various forms of zero-knowledge proofs that may be used, singly or in combination, consistently with this disclosure.

In an embodiment, secure proof is implemented using a challenge-response protocol. In an embodiment, this may function as a one-time pad implementation; for instance, a manufacturer or other trusted party may record a series of outputs (“responses”) produced by a device possessing secret information, given a series of corresponding inputs (“challenges”), and store them securely. In an embodiment, a challenge-response protocol may be combined with key generation. A single key may be used in one or more digital signatures as described in further detail below, such as signatures used to receive and/or transfer possession of crypto-currency assets; the key may be discarded for future use after a set period of time. In an embodiment, varied inputs include variations in local physical parameters, such as fluctuations in local electromagnetic fields, radiation, temperature, and the like, such that an almost limitless variety of private keys may be so generated. Secure proof may include encryption of a challenge to produce the response, indicating possession of a secret key. Encryption may be performed using a private key of a public key cryptographic system, or using a private key of a symmetric cryptographic system; for instance, trusted party may verify response by decrypting an encryption of challenge or of another datum using either a symmetric or public-key cryptographic system, verifying that a stored key matches the key used for encryption as a function of at least a device-specific secret. Keys may be generated by random variation in selection of prime numbers, for instance for the purposes of a cryptographic system such as RSA that relies prime factoring difficulty. Keys may be generated by randomized selection of parameters for a seed in a cryptographic system, such as elliptic curve cryptography, which is generated from a seed. Keys may be used to generate exponents for a cryptographic system such as Diffie-Helman or ElGamal that are based on the discrete logarithm problem.

Embodiments of apparatuses and methods described herein may generate, evaluate, and/or utilize digital signatures. A “digital signature,” as used herein, includes a secure proof of possession of a secret by a signing device, as performed on provided element of data, known as a “message.” A message may include an encrypted mathematical representation of a file or other set of data using the private key of a public key cryptographic system. Secure proof may include any form of secure proof as described in further detail below, including without limitation encryption using a private key of a public key cryptographic system as described above. Signature may be verified using a verification datum suitable for verification of a secure proof; for instance, where secure proof is enacted by encrypting message using a private key of a public key cryptographic system, verification may include decrypting the encrypted message using the corresponding public key and comparing the decrypted representation to a purported match that was not encrypted; if the signature protocol is well-designed and implemented correctly, this means the ability to create the digital signature is equivalent to possession of the private decryption key and/or device-specific secret. Likewise, if a message making up a mathematical representation of file is well-designed and implemented correctly, any alteration of the file may result in a mismatch with the digital signature; the mathematical representation may be produced using an alteration-sensitive, reliably reproducible algorithm, such as a hashing algorithm as described above. A mathematical representation to which the signature may be compared may be included with signature, for verification purposes; in other embodiments, the algorithm used to produce the mathematical representation may be publicly available, permitting the easy reproduction of the mathematical representation corresponding to any file.

In some embodiments, digital signatures may be combined with or incorporated in digital certificates. In one embodiment, a digital certificate is a file that conveys information and links the conveyed information to a “certificate authority” that is the issuer of a public key in a public key cryptographic system. Certificate authority in some embodiments contains data conveying the certificate authority's authorization for the recipient to perform a task. The authorization may be the authorization to access a given datum. The authorization may be the authorization to access a given process. In some embodiments, the certificate may identify the certificate authority. The digital certificate may include a digital signature.

In some embodiments, a third party such as a certificate authority (CA) is available to verify that the possessor of the private key is a particular entity; thus, if the certificate authority may be trusted, and the private key has not been stolen, the ability of an entity to produce a digital signature confirms the identity of the entity and links the file to the entity in a verifiable way. Digital signature may be incorporated in a digital certificate, which is a document authenticating the entity possessing the private key by authority of the issuing certificate authority and signed with a digital signature created with that private key and a mathematical representation of the remainder of the certificate. In other embodiments, digital signature is verified by comparing the digital signature to one known to have been created by the entity that purportedly signed the digital signature; for instance, if the public key that decrypts the known signature also decrypts the digital signature, the digital signature may be considered verified. Digital signature may also be used to verify that the file has not been altered since the formation of the digital signature.

Referring now to FIG. 1 , an exemplary embodiment of an apparatus 100 for contingent assignment actions is illustrated. Apparatus 100 includes a processor 104. Processor 104 may include any computing device as described in this disclosure, including without limitation a microcontroller, microprocessor, digital signal processor (DSP) and/or system on a chip (SoC) as described in this disclosure. Computing device may include, be included in, and/or communicate with a mobile device such as a mobile telephone or smartphone. Processor 104 may include a single computing device operating independently, or may include two or more computing device operating in concert, in parallel, sequentially or the like; two or more computing devices may be included together in a single computing device or in two or more computing devices. Processor 104 may interface or communicate with one or more additional devices as described below in further detail via a network interface device. Network interface device may be utilized for connecting processor 104 to one or more of a variety of networks, and one or more devices. Examples of a network interface device include, but are not limited to, a network interface card (e.g., a mobile network interface card, a LAN card), a modem, and any combination thereof. Examples of a network include, but are not limited to, a wide area network (e.g., the Internet, an enterprise network), a local area network (e.g., a network associated with an office, a building, a campus or other relatively small geographic space), a telephone network, a data network associated with a telephone/voice provider (e.g., a mobile communications provider data and/or voice network), a direct connection between two computing devices, and any combinations thereof. A network may employ a wired and/or a wireless mode of communication. In general, any network topology may be used. Information (e.g., data, software etc.) may be communicated to and/or from a computer and/or a computing device. Processor 104 may include but is not limited to, for example, a computing device or cluster of computing devices in a first location and a second computing device or cluster of computing devices in a second location. Processor 104 may include one or more computing devices dedicated to data storage, security, distribution of traffic for load balancing, and the like. Processor 104 may distribute one or more computing tasks as described below across a plurality of computing devices of computing device, which may operate in parallel, in series, redundantly, or in any other manner used for distribution of tasks or memory between computing devices. Processor 104 may be implemented using a “shared nothing” architecture in which data is cached at the worker, in an embodiment, this may enable scalability of system 100 and/or computing device.

With continued reference to FIG. 1 , processor 104 may be designed and/or configured to perform any method, method step, or sequence of method steps in any embodiment described in this disclosure, in any order and with any degree of repetition. For instance, processor 104 may be configured to perform a single step or sequence repeatedly until a desired or commanded outcome is achieved; repetition of a step or a sequence of steps may be performed iteratively and/or recursively using outputs of previous repetitions as inputs to subsequent repetitions, aggregating inputs and/or outputs of repetitions to produce an aggregate result, reduction or decrement of one or more variables such as global variables, and/or division of a larger processing task into a set of iteratively addressed smaller processing tasks. Processor 104 may perform any step or sequence of steps as described in this disclosure in parallel, such as simultaneously and/or substantially simultaneously performing a step two or more times using two or more parallel threads, processor cores, or the like; division of tasks between parallel threads and/or processes may be performed according to any protocol suitable for division of tasks between iterations. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which steps, sequences of steps, processing tasks, and/or data may be subdivided, shared, or otherwise dealt with using iteration, recursion, and/or parallel processing.

Continuing to reference FIG. 1 , processor 104 is configured to receive assignment data 108. “Assignment data” as used herein, information relating to an assignment. As used herein, an “assignment” is a task. A task may include a gig, a mission, or the like. A task may include courses such as without limitation in-person courses and live or prerecorded video courses, chores, dietary missions, exercise missions, or the like. An assignment may be used to improve a user's mental and/or physical health. A dietary mission may include missions such as “eating only 10 g of carbohydrates a day”, or “no processed food on the weekdays”, or “eat a vegetable with every meal”, or the like. An exercise mission may include tasks such as “work out 5 days a week”, “run 3 miles in 22 minutes”, or the like. A user 110 may be any user that receives an assignment, such as a child, employee, student, or the like. Assignment data 108 may include data on a user that the assignment is assigned to, whether the assignment is complete or incomplete, and the like. Assignment data may be in the form of text, PDF, word document, excel, or the like.

Continuing to reference FIG. 1 , assignment data 108 may be generated by an inner circle member 112. As used herein, an “inner circle member” is person with direct knowledge of an assignment. An inner circle member 112 may appoint a user 110 to receive an assignment 116. An inner circle member 112 may include parents, supervisors, validators, coaches, people of authority, or the like. Inner circle member 112 may be related to the assignment 116. For example, a parent may be an inner circle member 112 for an assignment 116 that involves house chores, like cleaning the dishes. In another embodiment, there may be multiple inner circle members 112 for an assignment. For example, a parent and a teacher may be an inner circle member 112. A parent may appoint a child to take a TOASTMASTERS class, but the teacher may provide insights on how the child is doing in the class.

Continuing to reference FIG. 1 , processor 104 may assign an assignment 116 to a user 110. In an embodiment, a processor 104 may assign an assignment 116 based on assignment data 108. Assignment data 108 may include data on a user 110 that assignment 116 is to be assigned to. In an embodiment, assignment data 108 may include contact information of a user 110, such as their email, IP address, phone number, or the like. In another embodiment, a processor 104 may assign an assignment to a user 110 of apparatus 100 at random. Each user may be assigned a number and a processor 104 may use a random number generator to select a user at random.

Continuing to reference FIG. 1 , processor 104 may generate a contingent action 118 as a function of the assignment data 108. Assignment data 108 may include data on a contingent action 118 (also referred to as an “action”). An “contingent action”, as used herein, is a data structure representing an action that will be performed upon the detection of a contingent condition. A contingent condition may be a proof validation. For example, action 118 may be contingent based on the validation of a cryptographic proof, discussed below. In an embodiment, an action 118 may include assigning a physical value, such as a monetary value to the assignment. As used here “physical value” is a quantifiable value. An action 118 may be a contingent payment on an immutable sequential listing, discussed in further detail below. An action 118 may also include generating a token certificate for the assignment. As used in this disclosure, a “token certificate” is a unique and non-interchangeable unit of data stored on a ledger representing ownership of an asset and/or a financial interest. As used in this disclosure, a “ledger” is a digital immutable ledger where data entries may be posted and cannot be altered. An action 118 may also include generating and sending a message to a user that completes the assignment. For example, an action 118 may be paying a user $10 for completing an assignment 116 of mowing the law. For example, an action 118 may include paying a user $2 for completing an assignment 116 of making straight A's in school. An action 118 may be determined by an inner circle member 112 and may be stored in assignment data 108. Data on action 118 may also include a schedule. As used here, a “schedule” is a plan that indicates time and sequence. For example, a schedule may include a time every week, month, year, etc. to assign assignment 116 to a user, such that the schedule is reoccurring. A schedule may also include a due date/time for assignment 116. A due date may be days, months, weeks, or the like away from the time of assigning the assignment 116. In an embodiment, actions 118 may be contingent based on the assignment 116. For example, an action of providing monetary value may only occur after the completion of an assignment 116. In another example, an action 118 may be contingent on the completion of one, five, ten, reoccurring assignments 116.

Continuing to reference FIG. 1 , generating contingent action 118 may include generating a cryptographic commitment to the assignment data 108 and the contingent action 118. A cryptographic commitment may be used to link any persons of apparatus 100 (i.e. user 110, inner circle member 112) to assignment data 108 and/or contingent action 118. Cryptographic commitment may be posted on an immutable sequential listing, discussed in further detail in FIG. 2 . Cryptographic commitment may include a Pedersen commitment. A “commitment”, as used herein, is a cryptographic algorithm that allows the user to commit to a certain value without revealing it. For example, a user 110/inner circle member 112 may be required to enter a user secret as a commitment. A user secret may include any data that is only known by or only possessed by the user 110/inner circle member 112. For example, a secret may include a password, a personal identification number, a mnemonic device, etc. Additionally or alternatively, user secret may be a biometric datum or a datum and/or key generated therefrom. This may be used to verify user identity to prove possession of an identifier later on when the commitment is opened. A “Pedersen commitment”, as used herein is a specific type of commitment that uses a secret message with at least two elements, a random secret, and a commitment algorithm that produces a commitment as a function of the secret message and a random secret. A receiver/verifier is given the commitment, secret message, and random secret and can verify the commitment by putting the secret message and random secret back into the commitment algorithm. A cryptographic commitment may additionally or alternatively include a cryptographic hash of the user secret, and/or a cryptographic accumulator such as a Merkle tree of the user secret. In an example where a password is the user secret, a hash of the commitment may be compared to the hash of the actual password to verify user identity. Additionally or alternative, a commitment may use a personal identification number, mnemonic device, biometric key/datum, and the like.

Still referencing FIG. 1 , processor 104 may use optical character recognition to parse assignment data 108 for assignment 116 and/or data on a user 110 to assign assignment 116 to and/or action 118. in some embodiments, optical character recognition or optical character reader (OCR) includes automatic conversion of images of written (e.g., typed, handwritten or printed text) into machine-encoded text. In some cases, recognition of at least a keyword from an image component may include one or more processes, including without limitation optical character recognition (OCR), optical word recognition, intelligent character recognition, intelligent word recognition, and the like. In some cases, OCR may recognize written text, one glyph or character at a time. In some cases, optical word recognition may recognize written text, one word at a time, for example, for languages that use a space as a word divider. In some cases, intelligent character recognition (ICR) may recognize written text one glyph or character at a time, for instance by employing machine-learning processes. In some cases, intelligent word recognition (IWR) may recognize written text, one word at a time, for instance by employing machine-learning processes.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , in some cases OCR may be an “offline” process, which analyses a static document or image frame. In some cases, handwriting movement analysis can be used as input to handwriting recognition. For example, instead of merely using shapes of glyphs and words, this technique may capture motions, such as the order in which segments are drawn, the direction, and the pattern of putting the pen down and lifting it. This additional information can make handwriting recognition more accurate. In some cases, this technology may be referred to as “online” character recognition, dynamic character recognition, real-time character recognition, and intelligent character recognition.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , in some cases, OCR processes may employ pre-processing of assignment data 108. Pre-processing process may include without limitation de-skew, de-speckle, binarization, line removal, layout analysis or “zoning,” line and word detection, script recognition, character isolation or “segmentation,” and normalization. In some cases, a de-skew process may include applying a transform (e.g., homography or affine transform) to image component to align text. In some cases, a de-speckle process may include removing positive and negative spots and/or smoothing edges. In some cases, a binarization process may include converting an image from color or greyscale to black-and-white (i.e., a binary image). Binarization may be performed as a simple way of separating text (or any other desired image component) from a background of image component. In some cases, binarization may be required for example if an employed OCR algorithm only works on binary images. In some cases. a line removal process may include removal of non-glyph or non-character imagery (e.g., boxes and lines). In some cases, a layout analysis or “zoning” process may identify columns, paragraphs, captions, and the like as distinct blocks. In some cases, a line and word detection process may establish a baseline for word and character shapes and separate words, if necessary. In some cases, a script recognition process may, for example in multilingual documents, identify script allowing an appropriate OCR algorithm to be selected. In some cases, a character isolation or “segmentation” process may separate signal characters, for example character-based OCR algorithms. In some cases, a normalization process may normalize aspect ratio and/or scale of assignment data 108.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , in some embodiments an OCR process will include an OCR algorithm. Exemplary OCR algorithms include matrix matching process and/or feature extraction processes. Matrix matching may involve comparing an image to a stored glyph on a pixel-by-pixel basis. In some case, matrix matching may also be known as “pattern matching,” “pattern recognition,” and/or “image correlation.” Matrix matching may rely on an input glyph being correctly isolated from the rest of the assignment data 108. Matrix matching may also rely on a stored glyph being in a similar font and at a same scale as input glyph. Matrix matching may work best with typewritten text.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , in some embodiments, an OCR process may include a feature extraction process. As used in this disclosure, a “feature” is an individual measurable property or characteristic. In some cases, feature extraction may decompose a glyph into at least a feature. Exemplary non-limiting features may include corners, edges, lines, closed loops, line direction, line intersections, and the like. In some cases, feature extraction may reduce dimensionality of representation and may make the recognition process computationally more efficient. In some cases, extracted feature can be compared with an abstract vector-like representation of a character, which might reduce to one or more glyph prototypes. General techniques of feature detection in computer vision are applicable to this type of OCR. In some embodiments, machine-learning process 116 like nearest neighbor classifiers (e.g., k-nearest neighbors algorithm) can be used to compare image features with stored glyph features and choose a nearest match. OCR may employ any machine-learning process described in this disclosure, for example machine-learning processes described with reference to FIGS. 3-5 . Exemplary non-limiting OCR software includes Cuneiform and Tesseract. Cuneiform is a multi-language, open-source optical character recognition system originally developed by Cognitive Technologies of Moscow, Russia. Tesseract is free OCR software originally developed by Hewlett-Packard of Palo Alto, Calif., United States.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , in some cases, OCR may employ a two-pass approach to character recognition. Second pass may include adaptive recognition and use letter shapes recognized with high confidence on a first pass to recognize better remaining letters on the second pass. In some cases, two-pass approach may be advantageous for unusual fonts or low-quality images where visual verbal/written content may be distorted. Another exemplary OCR software tool include OCRopus. OCRopus development is led by German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence in Kaiserslautern, Germany. In some cases, OCR software may employ neural networks, for example neural networks as taught in reference to FIGS. 3-4 .

Still referring to FIG. 1 , in some cases, OCR may include post-processing. For example, OCR accuracy can be increased, in some cases, if output is constrained by a lexicon. A lexicon may include a list or set of words that are allowed to occur in a document. In some cases, a lexicon may include, for instance, all the words in the English language, or a more technical lexicon for a specific field. In some cases, an output stream may be a plain text stream or file of characters. In some cases, an OCR process may preserve an original layout of visual verbal content. In some cases, near-neighbor analysis can make use of co-occurrence frequencies to correct errors, by noting that certain words are often seen together. For example, “Washington, D.C.” is generally far more common in English than “Washington DOC.” In some cases, an OCR process may make us of a priori knowledge of grammar for a language being recognized. For example, grammar rules may be used to help determine if a word is likely to be a verb or a noun. Distance conceptualization may be employed for recognition and classification. For example, a Levenshtein distance algorithm may be used in OCR post-processing to further optimize results.

Still referencing FIG. 1 , processor 104 is configured to receive a cryptographic proof 120 of an assignment pairing with a completion datum 122. As used herein, a “completion datum” is a piece of data showing completion. As used herein, “cryptographic proof” is any data structure that proves the veracity of an asserted fact. A cryptographic proof 120 may include a proof that a person posting the pairing is who they say they are. This may include using a password, digital signature, etc. A cryptographic proof 120 may include proof of knowledge that a user 110 completed assignment 116 or of something that is linked to assignment 116. For example, proof of knowledge may include a digital signature, a secret code a user 110 may use to prove a completion of an assignment 116, or the like. A secure proof may be used to provide a proof of knowledge. In an embodiment, user 110 may upload cryptographic proof 120 to processor 104. A completion datum 122 may include input image datum. Input image datum may be captured by an image capture device such as a camera, scanner, or the like. Completion datum 122 may also include an audio datum, such as audio datum captured by a microphone, or the like. In an embodiment, an input image datum may include a picture of a certificate showing completion of a course, such as a TOASTMASTERS course. In another embodiment, an input image data may show a successfully tied shoe. In another embodiment, input image data may show a completed ‘level’ in a game. In yet another embodiment, input image datum may include a written testimony indicating that an assignment is complete. For example, a testimony may be provided by a teacher of a child to attest to the fact that the child (user 110) has improved their math skills. Additionally, or alternatively, completion datum 122 showing an indication of completion of an assignment 108 may include audio. For example, audio may show a complete run through of a piece of music that a user 110 has been practicing. Audio may be captured using a microphone, or the like.

Still referencing FIG. 1 , processor 104 is configured to verify the completion datum 122. In an embodiment, an completion datum 122 may be verified using an image processing module. An image processing module may analyze input image data to ensure that they are authentic. For example, an image processing module may check to make sure that images are original and have not been modified, such as editing a “fail” into a “pass”. In an embodiment, an image processing module may check for repetition of pixels from cloning. In another embodiment, image processing module may check image input data for metadata, such as EXIF data for modifications to the EXIF data. In another embodiment, image processing module may perform geometric analysis. Geometric analysis may include, without limitation, analysis to determine that lines in an image intersect properly, analysis to determine if shadows are consistent with a light source, and the like. Additionally, an image processing module may analyze images to ensure that they accurately represent the assignment 108. For example, an image processing module may check that an image of a certificate says “TOASTMASTERS” for a TOASTMASTERS assignment.

With continued reference to FIG. 1 , processor 104 may also employ automatic speech recognition to examine completion datum 122. Exemplary automatic speech recognition technologies include, without limitation, dynamic time warping (DTW)-based speech recognition, end-to-end automatic speech recognition, hidden Markov models, neural networks, including deep feedforward and recurrent neural networks, and the like. In an embodiment, automatic speech recognition may be used to determine whether an assignment 116 was complete. For example, speech recognition may be used to authenticate or verify an identity of a speaker. Speaker may be user 110, inner circle member 112, or the like. For example, a speaker may be congratulating user 110 of a completion of an assignment in a video submitted as completion datum 122. In another example, a speaker may be user 110 demonstrating their Chinese ability in a video submitted as completion datum 122.

Continuing to reference FIG. 1 , processor 104 may validate a cryptographic proof 120 by receiving validation data 124 from a validator 128. As used herein, “validation data” is information that attests to the accuracy of the completion of an assignment. In an embodiment, processor 104 may send cryptographic proof 120 to validator 128 to validate. A validator 128 may be a user of apparatus 100. A validator 128 may be a user 110 that has some level of knowledge about the assignment 116. In another embodiment, a validator 128 may be a third-party that has some knowledge of assignment 116. A “third party,” as used in this disclosure, refers to a user who does not receive assignments. A validator 128 may include another user that may have some level of experience in the assignment 116 and may have the ability to assess whether user 110 has completed the assignment 116, or whether the completion datum 122 paired with the assignment 116 is accurate. An example of a validator 128 may be another user who has mowed a lawn over thirty times, and now would be considered experienced in mowing lawns. This user could then validate if other users have successfully mowed a lawn by either validating or invalidating the completion datum 122 assignment 116 pair that has been sent to processor 104. Validator 128 may not be the same user that was assigned/completed the assignment 116. During the selection of validator 128, there may be a verification protocol to ensure that validator 128 is an actual user. There may be at least one validator 128 used to validate cryptographic proof 120. Each validator 128 may be unrelated to each other.

Continuing reference to FIG. 1 , a machine-learning model 132 may find validators 128 to validate cryptographic proof 120. Machine-learning model 132 may be consistent with any machine-learning process as discussed herein. An example of a machine-learning process is image recognition. Imagine recognition occurs when a processor can identify an object as a digital image and obtain qualities of that image through use of various specific programs. Another example of machine-learning process that may be used is speech recognition. Speech recognition can be used to translate speech into text, such as voice search, voice dialing, appliance control, etc. Machine-learning model 132 may use training data that may contain a plurality of inputs containing validator information correlated to a plurality of outputs that may contain validators 128. Machine-learning model 132 may be a classifier that classifies validators 128 based on their information. A “specified location” as used herein, refers to a user's entire information procession environment, or a portion thereof, which may be located at multiple sites or a single location. Examples of specified locations that can be used to select an action datum validator are their zip code, city, street address, etc. Other examples of possible action datum validator information could be geo-location, time-zone, age, experience level, etc. Selecting validator 128 may comprise locating a plurality of validators within a specified location. A validator 128 may be selecting by using any set of data to group validators 128 into smaller subgroups that may be used within machine-learning model 132.

Continuing reference to FIG. 1 , selection of a validator 128 may utilize a cryptanalysis protocol. The term “cryptanalysis protocol” as used herein, refers to the process of deciphering complex strings of user data. Cryptanalysis protocol may analyze all user 110 data and find consistencies with a group of potential validators 128. Types of information that the cryptanalysis protocol may use may include address, intelligence level, emotional intelligence levels, time spent online, average time to complete a task, etc. Cryptanalysis protocol may utilize different types of algorithms to decipher sensitive information that a user does not want available to the entirety of the platform.

As used in this disclosure, “authentication” is a process of ensuring that which is being “authenticated” complies with certain constraints, for example without limitation system requirements, regulations, and the like. In some cases, authentication may include comparing a user, such as without limitation a validator 128 against one or more acceptance criteria. For example, in some cases, a validator 128 may be required to go through multi-factor authentication. Ensuring that validator 128 is in compliance with acceptance criteria may, in some cases, constitute authentication. In some cases, authentication may include ensuring that data is complete, for example that all required data types, are present, readable, uncorrupted, and/or otherwise useful for processor 104. In some cases, some or all authentication processes may be performed by processor 104. In some cases, at least a machine-learning process, for example a machine-learning model, may be used to verify. Processor 104 may use any machine-learning process described in this disclosure for this or any other function. In some embodiments, at least one of authentication and/or verification includes without limitation one or more of supervisory validation, machine-learning processes, graph-based validation, geometry-based validation, and rules-based validation

Processor 104 may use multi-factor authentication to authenticate the identity of a user/validator 128. A “multi-factor authentication” as used herein, refers to an electronic authentication method in which a user is granted access to an application only after successfully presenting at least two different identity confirming information to a processor. Examples of forms of multi-factor authentication are knowledge, possession, inherent, location, etc. Multi-factor authentication through the use of knowledge may require a validator 128 to prove knowledge of a secret in order to authenticate. A password may be used as a mechanism for knowledge authentication. Multi-factor authentication through the use of possession may require a passcode or a security token as a possession factor to authenticate the identity of the action datum identifier or the action datum validator. Multi-factor authentication through the use of inherent knowledge may require the action datum identifier or action datum validator to provide a biometric sample such as a fingerprint or face scan to verify one's identity. Behavioral biometrics such as keystroke dynamics can also be used as inherent verification. Multi-factor authentication through the use of location may require the validator 128 and/or user 110 to disclose their location to verify their identity. Processor 104 may require validator 128 to scan their lips as a biometric verification. Processor 104 may require validator 128 to submit dental records as a form of biometric verification. Dental records coupled with a lip scan conducted upon entry to the platform may be used as a multifactor authentication procedure to verify the action datum validator's identity. Processor 104 may use facial identification that requires the action datum validator to blink five times, look left, look right, look up then look down so that a full retinal exam may be conducted. Multi-factor authentication may also include encryption/decryption. In an embodiment, cryptographic proof 120 that needs to be validated may be encrypted with a public key. Only a private key, that validator 128 may have, may decrypt cryptographic proof 120 to be validated. Encryption and decryption methods are discussed above.

Continuing reference to FIG. 1 , cryptographic proof 120 may be transmitted to a validator 128 using a transmission protocol. The term “transmitted” as used herein, refers to the process of passing information from one source to another. For instance, completion datum 122 and/or assignment 116 may be transmitted to a validator 128 through an emailed notification or mobile phone alert. Once validator 128 has been verified and cleared to validate completion datum 122, they may receive an email or text notification that completion datum 122 has been transmitted to their account for viewing. The term “transmission protocol” as used herein, refers to the process by which the cryptographic proof 120 is received from user 110 and sent to validator 128 for validation. Transmission protocol may require that user 110 provides their signature affirming that the assignment 116 was completed to the best of their ability. Transmission protocol may also require that the validator 128 provides photographic evidence that they are the only users who are viewing and validating the action datum.

Continuing reference to FIG. 1 , validation data 124 may include the validation from validator 128. An example of validation data 124 may include a label that may be either “valid,” “invalid,” “inconclusive,” etc. Receiving the input from validator 128 may further include receiving a validity string. A “validity string” as used herein, refers to the data values that are made up from the information collected from labels. Each of the validators 128 may assign their own label to completion datum 122. Each of the validators 128 may use a binary response such as valid or invalid; it could be graded on a spectrum such as from 0-100; it could be given an alphabetical ranking system; the completion could be validated by identifying the percentage of the action that was finished; etc. The term “input” as used herein, refers to data that is uploaded to processor 104. Examples of input may be any selection or verification regarding the completion of assignment 116. If validator 128 deems the assignment 116 as completed, the validator 128 may upload their input to the processor in the form of validation data 124 such that user 110 may be made aware of validation data 124. The term “valid” refers to an assignment 116 that has been executed properly by user 110. An example of a “valid” label could occur when user 110 submits completion datum 122 that depicts a properly mowed lawn. Validator 128 would then assign a valid label to evidence 116. The term “invalid” refers to an assignment 116 that has not been properly executed by user 110. An example of an invalid label could occur when a user 110 submits completion datum 122 that depicts a half full sink of dishes. If the assignment 116 was to clean all the dishes, the assignment 116 has not been satisfied, thus validator 128 would label the action datum invalid.

Continuing to reference FIG. 1 , processor 104 is configured to execute the contingent action 118 as a function of the assignment data 108 and the validation of cryptographic proof 120. Action 118 may be stored on an immutable sequential listing, as discussed in FIG. 2 . Cryptographic proof 120, the validation of cryptographic proof 120, and the like may also be posted on an immutable sequential listing. For example, action 118 may include a monetary payment that may be stored on an immutable sequential listing. A monetary payment may include payment in any form of money, such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, US dollar, Euros, Yuan, Yen, or the like. Executing the action 118 may include posting the monetary payment, or the like. An action may also include generating a token certificate, or the like.

Additional disclosure on token certificate generation can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/872,254, filed on Jul. 25, 2022, entitled “APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GENERATING A TOKEN CERTIFICATE ASSOCIATED WITH AN ASSIGNMENT,”, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

Referring now to FIG. 2 , an exemplary embodiment of an immutable sequential listing 200 is illustrated. Data elements are listing in immutable sequential listing 200; data elements may include any form of data, including textual data, image data, encrypted data, cryptographically hashed data, and the like. Data elements may include, without limitation, one or more at least a digitally signed assertions. In one embodiment, a digitally signed assertion 204 is a collection of textual data signed using a secure proof as described in further detail below; secure proof may include, without limitation, a digital signature as described above. Collection of textual data may contain any textual data, including without limitation American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII), Unicode, or similar computer-encoded textual data, any alphanumeric data, punctuation, diacritical mark, or any character or other marking used in any writing system to convey information, in any form, including any plaintext or cyphertext data; in an embodiment, collection of textual data may be encrypted, or may be a hash of other data, such as a root or node of a Merkle tree or hash tree, or a hash of any other information desired to be recorded in some fashion using a digitally signed assertion 204. In an embodiment, collection of textual data states that the owner of a certain transferable item represented in a digitally signed assertion 204 register is transferring that item to the owner of an address. A digitally signed assertion 204 may be signed by a digital signature created using the private key associated with the owner's public key, as described above.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , a digitally signed assertion 204 may describe a transfer of virtual currency, such as crypto-currency as described below. The virtual currency may be a digital currency. Item of value may be a transfer of trust, for instance represented by a statement vouching for the identity or trustworthiness of the first entity. Item of value may be an interest in a fungible negotiable financial instrument representing ownership in a public or private corporation, a creditor relationship with a governmental body or a corporation, rights to ownership represented by an option, derivative financial instrument, commodity, debt-backed security such as a bond or debenture or other security as described in further detail below. A resource may be a physical machine e.g. a ride share vehicle or any other asset. A digitally signed assertion 204 may describe the transfer of a physical good; for instance, a digitally signed assertion 204 may describe the sale of a product. In some embodiments, a transfer nominally of one item may be used to represent a transfer of another item; for instance, a transfer of virtual currency may be interpreted as representing a transfer of an access right; conversely, where the item nominally transferred is something other than virtual currency, the transfer itself may still be treated as a transfer of virtual currency, having value that depends on many potential factors including the value of the item nominally transferred and the monetary value attendant to having the output of the transfer moved into a particular user's control. The item of value may be associated with a digitally signed assertion 204 by means of an exterior protocol, such as the COLORED COINS created according to protocols developed by The Colored Coins Foundation, the MASTERCOIN protocol developed by the Mastercoin Foundation, or the ETHEREUM platform offered by the Stiftung Ethereum Foundation of Baar, Switzerland, the Thunder protocol developed by Thunder Consensus, or any other protocol.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , in one embodiment, an address is a textual datum identifying the recipient of virtual currency or another item of value in a digitally signed assertion 204. In some embodiments, address is linked to a public key, the corresponding private key of which is owned by the recipient of a digitally signed assertion 204. For instance, address may be the public key. Address may be a representation, such as a hash, of the public key. Address may be linked to the public key in memory of a computing device, for instance via a “wallet shortener” protocol. Where address is linked to a public key, a transferee in a digitally signed assertion 204 may record a subsequent a digitally signed assertion 204 transferring some or all of the value transferred in the first a digitally signed assertion 204 to a new address in the same manner. A digitally signed assertion 204 may contain textual information that is not a transfer of some item of value in addition to, or as an alternative to, such a transfer. For instance, as described in further detail below, a digitally signed assertion 204 may indicate a confidence level associated with a distributed storage node as described in further detail below.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 2 immutable sequential listing 200 records a series of at least a posted content in a way that preserves the order in which the at least a posted content took place. Temporally sequential listing may be accessible at any of various security settings; for instance, and without limitation, temporally sequential listing may be readable and modifiable publicly, may be publicly readable but writable only by entities and/or devices having access privileges established by password protection, confidence level, or any device authentication procedure or facilities described herein, or may be readable and/or writable only by entities and/or devices having such access privileges. Access privileges may exist in more than one level, including, without limitation, a first access level or community of permitted entities and/or devices having ability to read, and a second access level or community of permitted entities and/or devices having ability to write; first and second community may be overlapping or non-overlapping. In an embodiment, posted content and/or immutable sequential listing 200 may be stored as one or more zero knowledge sets (ZKS), Private Information Retrieval (PIR) structure, or any other structure that allows checking of membership in a set by querying with specific properties. Such database may incorporate protective measures to ensure that malicious actors may not query the database repeatedly in an effort to narrow the members of a set to reveal uniquely identifying information of a given posted content.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , immutable sequential listing 200 may preserve the order in which the at least a posted content took place by listing them in chronological order; alternatively or additionally, immutable sequential listing 200 may organize digitally signed assertions 204 into sub-listings 208 such as “blocks” in a blockchain, which may be themselves collected in a temporally sequential order; digitally signed assertions 204 within a sub-listing 208 may or may not be temporally sequential. The ledger may preserve the order in which at least a posted content took place by listing them in sub-listings 208 and placing the sub-listings 208 in chronological order. The immutable sequential listing 200 may be a distributed, consensus-based ledger, such as those operated according to the protocols promulgated by Ripple Labs, Inc., of San Francisco, Calif., or the Stellar Development Foundation, of San Francisco, Calif., or of Thunder Consensus. In some embodiments, the ledger is a secured ledger; in one embodiment, a secured ledger is a ledger having safeguards against alteration by unauthorized parties. The ledger may be maintained by a proprietor, such as a system administrator on a server, that controls access to the ledger; for instance, the user account controls may allow contributors to the ledger to add at least a posted content to the ledger, but may not allow any users to alter at least a posted content that have been added to the ledger. In some embodiments, ledger is cryptographically secured; in one embodiment, a ledger is cryptographically secured where each link in the chain contains encrypted or hashed information that makes it practically infeasible to alter the ledger without betraying that alteration has taken place, for instance by requiring that an administrator or other party sign new additions to the chain with a digital signature. Immutable sequential listing 200 may be incorporated in, stored in, or incorporate, any suitable data structure, including without limitation any database, datastore, file structure, distributed hash table, directed acyclic graph or the like. In some embodiments, the timestamp of an entry is cryptographically secured and validated via trusted time, either directly on the chain or indirectly by utilizing a separate chain. In one embodiment the validity of timestamp is provided using a time stamping authority as described in the RFC 3161 standard for trusted timestamps, or in the ANSI ASC x9.95 standard. In another embodiment, the trusted time ordering is provided by a group of entities collectively acting as the time stamping authority with a requirement that a threshold number of the group of authorities sign the timestamp.

In some embodiments, and with continued reference to FIG. 2 , immutable sequential listing 200, once formed, may be inalterable by any party, no matter what access rights that party possesses. For instance, immutable sequential listing 200 may include a hash chain, in which data is added during a successive hashing process to ensure non-repudiation. Immutable sequential listing 200 may include a block chain. In one embodiment, a block chain is immutable sequential listing 200 that records one or more new at least a posted content in a data item known as a sub-listing 208 or “block.” An example of a block chain is the BITCOIN block chain used to record BITCOIN transactions and values. Sub-listings 208 may be created in a way that places the sub-listings 208 in chronological order and link each sub-listing 208 to a previous sub-listing 208 in the chronological order so that any computing device may traverse the sub-listings 208 in reverse chronological order to verify any at least a posted content listed in the block chain. Each new sub-listing 208 may be required to contain a cryptographic hash describing the previous sub-listing 208. In some embodiments, the block chain contains a single first sub-listing 208 sometimes known as a “genesis block.”

Still referring to FIG. 2 , the creation of a new sub-listing 208 may be computationally expensive; for instance, the creation of a new sub-listing 208 may be designed by a “proof of work” protocol accepted by all participants in forming the immutable sequential listing 200 to take a powerful set of computing devices a certain period of time to produce. Where one sub-listing 208 takes less time for a given set of computing devices to produce the sub-listing 208 protocol may adjust the algorithm to produce the next sub-listing 208 so that it will require more steps; where one sub-listing 208 takes more time for a given set of computing devices to produce the sub-listing 208 protocol may adjust the algorithm to produce the next sub-listing 208 so that it will require fewer steps. As an example, protocol may require a new sub-listing 208 to contain a cryptographic hash describing its contents; the cryptographic hash may be required to satisfy a mathematical condition, achieved by having the sub-listing 208 contain a number, called a nonce, whose value is determined after the fact by the discovery of the hash that satisfies the mathematical condition. Continuing the example, the protocol may be able to adjust the mathematical condition so that the discovery of the hash describing a sub-listing 208 and satisfying the mathematical condition requires more or less steps, depending on the outcome of the previous hashing attempt. Mathematical condition, as an example, might be that the hash contains a certain number of leading zeros and a hashing algorithm that requires more steps to find a hash containing a greater number of leading zeros, and fewer steps to find a hash containing a lesser number of leading zeros. In some embodiments, production of a new sub-listing 208 according to the protocol is known as “mining.” The creation of a new sub-listing 208 may be designed by a “proof of stake” protocol as will be apparent to those skilled in the art upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2 , in some embodiments, protocol also creates an incentive to mine new sub-listings 208. The incentive may be financial; for instance, successfully mining a new sub-listing 208 may result in the person or entity that mines the sub-listing 208 receiving a predetermined amount of currency. The currency may be fiat currency. Currency may be cryptocurrency as defined below. In other embodiments, incentive may be redeemed for particular products or services; the incentive may be a gift certificate with a particular business, for instance. In some embodiments, incentive is sufficiently attractive to cause participants to compete for the incentive by trying to race each other to the creation of sub-listings 208 Each sub-listing 208 created in immutable sequential listing 200 may contain a record or at least a posted content describing one or more addresses that receive an incentive, such as virtual currency, as the result of successfully mining the sub-listing 208.

With continued reference to FIG. 2 , where two entities simultaneously create new sub-listings 208, immutable sequential listing 200 may develop a fork; protocol may determine which of the two alternate branches in the fork is the valid new portion of the immutable sequential listing 200 by evaluating, after a certain amount of time has passed, which branch is longer. “Length” may be measured according to the number of sub-listings 208 in the branch. Length may be measured according to the total computational cost of producing the branch. Protocol may treat only at least a posted content contained the valid branch as valid at least a posted content. When a branch is found invalid according to this protocol, at least a posted content registered in that branch may be recreated in a new sub-listing 208 in the valid branch; the protocol may reject “double spending” at least a posted content that transfer the same virtual currency that another at least a posted content in the valid branch has already transferred. As a result, in some embodiments the creation of fraudulent at least a posted content requires the creation of a longer immutable sequential listing 200 branch by the entity attempting the fraudulent at least a posted content than the branch being produced by the rest of the participants; as long as the entity creating the fraudulent at least a posted content is likely the only one with the incentive to create the branch containing the fraudulent at least a posted content, the computational cost of the creation of that branch may be practically infeasible, guaranteeing the validity of all at least a posted content in the immutable sequential listing 200.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , additional data linked to at least a posted content may be incorporated in sub-listings 208 in the immutable sequential listing 200; for instance, data may be incorporated in one or more fields recognized by block chain protocols that permit a person or computer forming a at least a posted content to insert additional data in the immutable sequential listing 200. In some embodiments, additional data is incorporated in an unspendable at least a posted content field. For instance, the data may be incorporated in an OP RETURN within the BITCOIN block chain. In other embodiments, additional data is incorporated in one signature of a multi-signature at least a posted content. In an embodiment, a multi-signature at least a posted content is at least a posted content to two or more addresses. In some embodiments, the two or more addresses are hashed together to form a single address, which is signed in the digital signature of the at least a posted content. In other embodiments, the two or more addresses are concatenated. In some embodiments, two or more addresses may be combined by a more complicated process, such as the creation of a Merkle tree or the like. In some embodiments, one or more addresses incorporated in the multi-signature at least a posted content are typical crypto-currency addresses, such as addresses linked to public keys as described above, while one or more additional addresses in the multi-signature at least a posted content contain additional data related to the at least a posted content; for instance, the additional data may indicate the purpose of the at least a posted content, aside from an exchange of virtual currency, such as the item for which the virtual currency was exchanged. In some embodiments, additional information may include network statistics for a given node of network, such as a distributed storage node, e.g. the latencies to nearest neighbors in a network graph, the identities or identifying information of neighboring nodes in the network graph, the trust level and/or mechanisms of trust (e.g. certificates of physical encryption keys, certificates of software encryption keys, (in non-limiting example certificates of software encryption may indicate the firmware version, manufacturer, hardware version and the like), certificates from a trusted third party, certificates from a decentralized anonymous authentication procedure, and other information quantifying the trusted status of the distributed storage node) of neighboring nodes in the network graph, IP addresses, GPS coordinates, and other information informing location of the node and/or neighboring nodes, geographically and/or within the network graph. In some embodiments, additional information may include history and/or statistics of neighboring nodes with which the node has interacted. In some embodiments, this additional information may be encoded directly, via a hash, hash tree or other encoding.

With continued reference to FIG. 2 , in some embodiments, virtual currency is traded as a crypto-currency. In one embodiment, a crypto-currency is a digital, currency such as Bitcoins, Peercoins, Namecoins, and Litecoins. Crypto-currency may be a clone of another crypto-currency. The crypto-currency may be an “alt-coin.” Crypto-currency may be decentralized, with no particular entity controlling it; the integrity of the crypto-currency may be maintained by adherence by its participants to established protocols for exchange and for production of new currency, which may be enforced by software implementing the crypto-currency. Crypto-currency may be centralized, with its protocols enforced or hosted by a particular entity. For instance, crypto-currency may be maintained in a centralized ledger, as in the case of the XRP. currency of Ripple Labs, Inc., of San Francisco, Calif. In lieu of a centrally controlling authority, such as a national bank, to manage currency values, the number of units of a particular crypto-currency may be limited; the rate at which units of crypto-currency enter the market may be managed by a mutually agreed-upon process, such as creating new units of currency when mathematical puzzles are solved, the degree of difficulty of the puzzles being adjustable to control the rate at which new units enter the market. Mathematical puzzles may be the same as the algorithms used to make productions of sub-listings 208 in a block chain computationally challenging; the incentive for producing sub-listings 208 may include the grant of new crypto-currency to the miners. Quantities of crypto-currency may be exchanged using at least a posted content as described above.

Referring now to FIG. 3 , an exemplary embodiment of neural network 300 is illustrated. A neural network 300 also known as an artificial neural network, is a network of “nodes,” or data structures having one or more inputs, one or more outputs, and a function determining outputs based on inputs. Such nodes may be organized in a network, such as without limitation a convolutional neural network, including an input layer of nodes 304, one or more intermediate layers 308, and an output layer of nodes 312. Connections between nodes may be created via the process of “training” the network, in which elements from a training dataset are applied to the input nodes, a suitable training algorithm (such as Levenberg-Marquardt, conjugate gradient, simulated annealing, or other algorithms) is then used to adjust the connections and weights between nodes in adjacent layers of the neural network to produce the desired values at the output nodes. This process is sometimes referred to as deep learning. Connections may run solely from input nodes toward output nodes in a “feed-forward” network, or may feed outputs of one layer back to inputs of the same or a different layer in a “recurrent network.” As a further non-limiting example, a neural network may include a convolutional neural network comprising an input layer of nodes, one or more intermediate layers, and an output layer of nodes. A “convolutional neural network,” as used in this disclosure, is a neural network in which at least one hidden layer is a convolutional layer that convolves inputs to that layer with a subset of inputs known as a “kernel,” along with one or more additional layers such as pooling layers, fully connected layers, and the like.

Referring now to FIG. 4 , an exemplary embodiment of a node of a neural network is illustrated. A node may include, without limitation a plurality of inputs x_(i) that may receive numerical values from inputs to a neural network containing the node and/or from other nodes. Node may perform a weighted sum of inputs using weights w_(i) that are multiplied by respective inputs x_(i). Additionally or alternatively, a bias b may be added to the weighted sum of the inputs such that an offset is added to each unit in the neural network layer that is independent of the input to the layer. The weighted sum may then be input into a function φ, which may generate one or more outputs y. Weight w_(i) applied to an input x_(i) may indicate whether the input is “excitatory,” indicating that it has strong influence on the one or more outputs y, for instance by the corresponding weight having a large numerical value, and/or a “inhibitory,” indicating it has a weak effect influence on the one more inputs y, for instance by the corresponding weight having a small numerical value. The values of weights w_(i) may be determined by training a neural network using training data, which may be performed using any suitable process as described above.

Referring now to FIG. 5 , an exemplary embodiment of a machine-learning module 500 that may perform one or more machine-learning processes as described in this disclosure is illustrated. Machine-learning module may perform determinations, classification, and/or analysis steps, methods, processes, or the like as described in this disclosure using machine learning processes. A “machine learning process,” as used in this disclosure, is a process that automatedly uses training data 504 to generate an algorithm that will be performed by a computing device/module to produce outputs 508 given data provided as inputs 512; this is in contrast to a non-machine learning software program where the commands to be executed are determined in advance by a user and written in a programming language.

Still referring to FIG. 5 , “training data,” as used herein, is data containing correlations that a machine-learning process may use to model relationships between two or more categories of data elements. For instance, and without limitation, training data 504 may include a plurality of data entries, each entry representing a set of data elements that were recorded, received, and/or generated together; data elements may be correlated by shared existence in a given data entry, by proximity in a given data entry, or the like. Multiple data entries in training data 504 may evince one or more trends in correlations between categories of data elements; for instance, and without limitation, a higher value of a first data element belonging to a first category of data element may tend to correlate to a higher value of a second data element belonging to a second category of data element, indicating a possible proportional or other mathematical relationship linking values belonging to the two categories. Multiple categories of data elements may be related in training data 504 according to various correlations; correlations may indicate causative and/or predictive links between categories of data elements, which may be modeled as relationships such as mathematical relationships by machine-learning processes as described in further detail below. Training data 504 may be formatted and/or organized by categories of data elements, for instance by associating data elements with one or more descriptors corresponding to categories of data elements. As a non-limiting example, training data 504 may include data entered in standardized forms by persons or processes, such that entry of a given data element in a given field in a form may be mapped to one or more descriptors of categories. Elements in training data 504 may be linked to descriptors of categories by tags, tokens, or other data elements; for instance, and without limitation, training data 504 may be provided in fixed-length formats, formats linking positions of data to categories such as comma-separated value (CSV) formats and/or self-describing formats such as extensible markup language (XML), JavaScript Object Notation (JSON), or the like, enabling processes or devices to detect categories of data.

Alternatively or additionally, and continuing to refer to FIG. 5 , training data 504 may include one or more elements that are not categorized; that is, training data 504 may not be formatted or contain descriptors for some elements of data. Machine-learning algorithms and/or other processes may sort training data 504 according to one or more categorizations using, for instance, natural language processing algorithms, tokenization, detection of correlated values in raw data and the like; categories may be generated using correlation and/or other processing algorithms. As a non-limiting example, in a corpus of text, phrases making up a number “n” of compound words, such as nouns modified by other nouns, may be identified according to a statistically significant prevalence of n-grams containing such words in a particular order; such an n-gram may be categorized as an element of language such as a “word” to be tracked similarly to single words, generating a new category as a result of statistical analysis. Similarly, in a data entry including some textual data, a person's name may be identified by reference to a list, dictionary, or other compendium of terms, permitting ad-hoc categorization by machine-learning algorithms, and/or automated association of data in the data entry with descriptors or into a given format. The ability to categorize data entries automatedly may enable the same training data 504 to be made applicable for two or more distinct machine-learning algorithms as described in further detail below. Training data 504 used by machine-learning module 500 may correlate any input data as described in this disclosure to any output data as described in this disclosure.

Further referring to FIG. 5 , training data may be filtered, sorted, and/or selected using one or more supervised and/or unsupervised machine-learning processes and/or models as described in further detail below; such models may include without limitation a training data classifier 516. Training data classifier 516 may include a “classifier,” which as used in this disclosure is a machine-learning model as defined below, such as a mathematical model, neural net, or program generated by a machine learning algorithm known as a “classification algorithm,” as described in further detail below, that sorts inputs into categories or bins of data, outputting the categories or bins of data and/or labels associated therewith. A classifier may be configured to output at least a datum that labels or otherwise identifies a set of data that are clustered together, found to be close under a distance metric as described below, or the like. Machine-learning module 500 may generate a classifier using a classification algorithm, defined as a processes whereby a computing device and/or any module and/or component operating thereon derives a classifier from training data 504. Classification may be performed using, without limitation, linear classifiers such as without limitation logistic regression and/or naive Bayes classifiers, nearest neighbor classifiers such as k-nearest neighbors classifiers, support vector machines, least squares support vector machines, fisher's linear discriminant, quadratic classifiers, decision trees, boosted trees, random forest classifiers, learning vector quantization, and/or neural network-based classifiers.

Still referring to FIG. 5 , machine-learning module 500 may be configured to perform a lazy-learning process 520 and/or protocol, which may alternatively be referred to as a “lazy loading” or “call-when-needed” process and/or protocol, may be a process whereby machine learning is conducted upon receipt of an input to be converted to an output, by combining the input and training set to derive the algorithm to be used to produce the output on demand. For instance, an initial set of simulations may be performed to cover an initial heuristic and/or “first guess” at an output and/or relationship. As a non-limiting example, an initial heuristic may include a ranking of associations between inputs and elements of training data 504. Heuristic may include selecting some number of highest-ranking associations and/or training data 504 elements. Lazy learning may implement any suitable lazy learning algorithm, including without limitation a K-nearest neighbors algorithm, a lazy naïve Bayes algorithm, or the like; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various lazy-learning algorithms that may be applied to generate outputs as described in this disclosure, including without limitation lazy learning applications of machine-learning algorithms as described in further detail below.

Alternatively or additionally, and with continued reference to FIG. 5 , machine-learning processes as described in this disclosure may be used to generate machine-learning models 524. A “machine-learning model,” as used in this disclosure, is a mathematical and/or algorithmic representation of a relationship between inputs and outputs, as generated using any machine-learning process including without limitation any process as described above, and stored in memory; an input is submitted to a machine-learning model 524 once created, which generates an output based on the relationship that was derived. For instance, and without limitation, a linear regression model, generated using a linear regression algorithm, may compute a linear combination of input data using coefficients derived during machine-learning processes to calculate an output datum. As a further non-limiting example, a machine-learning model 524 may be generated by creating an artificial neural network, such as a convolutional neural network comprising an input layer of nodes, one or more intermediate layers, and an output layer of nodes. Connections between nodes may be created via the process of “training” the network, in which elements from a training data 504 set are applied to the input nodes, a suitable training algorithm (such as Levenberg-Marquardt, conjugate gradient, simulated annealing, or other algorithms) is then used to adjust the connections and weights between nodes in adjacent layers of the neural network to produce the desired values at the output nodes. This process is sometimes referred to as deep learning.

Still referring to FIG. 5 , machine-learning algorithms may include at least a supervised machine-learning process 528. At least a supervised machine-learning process 528, as defined herein, include algorithms that receive a training set relating a number of inputs to a number of outputs, and seek to find one or more mathematical relations relating inputs to outputs, where each of the one or more mathematical relations is optimal according to some criterion specified to the algorithm using some scoring function. For instance, a supervised learning algorithm may include inputs and outputs as described above in this disclosure, and a scoring function representing a desired form of relationship to be detected between inputs and outputs; scoring function may, for instance, seek to maximize the probability that a given input and/or combination of elements inputs is associated with a given output to minimize the probability that a given input is not associated with a given output. Scoring function may be expressed as a risk function representing an “expected loss” of an algorithm relating inputs to outputs, where loss is computed as an error function representing a degree to which a prediction generated by the relation is incorrect when compared to a given input-output pair provided in training data 504. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various possible variations of at least a supervised machine-learning process 528 that may be used to determine relation between inputs and outputs. Supervised machine-learning processes may include classification algorithms as defined above.

Further referring to FIG. 5 , machine learning processes may include at least an unsupervised machine-learning processes 532. An unsupervised machine-learning process, as used herein, is a process that derives inferences in datasets without regard to labels; as a result, an unsupervised machine-learning process may be free to discover any structure, relationship, and/or correlation provided in the data. Unsupervised processes may not require a response variable; unsupervised processes may be used to find interesting patterns and/or inferences between variables, to determine a degree of correlation between two or more variables, or the like.

Still referring to FIG. 5 , machine-learning module 500 may be designed and configured to create a machine-learning model 524 using techniques for development of linear regression models. Linear regression models may include ordinary least squares regression, which aims to minimize the square of the difference between predicted outcomes and actual outcomes according to an appropriate norm for measuring such a difference (e.g. a vector-space distance norm); coefficients of the resulting linear equation may be modified to improve minimization. Linear regression models may include ridge regression methods, where the function to be minimized includes the least-squares function plus term multiplying the square of each coefficient by a scalar amount to penalize large coefficients. Linear regression models may include least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) models, in which ridge regression is combined with multiplying the least-squares term by a factor of 1 divided by double the number of samples. Linear regression models may include a multi-task lasso model wherein the norm applied in the least-squares term of the lasso model is the Frobenius norm amounting to the square root of the sum of squares of all terms. Linear regression models may include the elastic net model, a multi-task elastic net model, a least angle regression model, a LARS lasso model, an orthogonal matching pursuit model, a Bayesian regression model, a logistic regression model, a stochastic gradient descent model, a perceptron model, a passive aggressive algorithm, a robustness regression model, a Huber regression model, or any other suitable model that may occur to persons skilled in the art upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure. Linear regression models may be generalized in an embodiment to polynomial regression models, whereby a polynomial equation (e.g. a quadratic, cubic or higher-order equation) providing a best predicted output/actual output fit is sought; similar methods to those described above may be applied to minimize error functions, as will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 5 , machine-learning algorithms may include, without limitation, linear discriminant analysis. Machine-learning algorithm may include quadratic discriminate analysis. Machine-learning algorithms may include kernel ridge regression. Machine-learning algorithms may include support vector machines, including without limitation support vector classification-based regression processes. Machine-learning algorithms may include stochastic gradient descent algorithms, including classification and regression algorithms based on stochastic gradient descent. Machine-learning algorithms may include nearest neighbors algorithms. Machine-learning algorithms may include various forms of latent space regularization such as variational regularization. Machine-learning algorithms may include Gaussian processes such as Gaussian Process Regression. Machine-learning algorithms may include cross-decomposition algorithms, including partial least squares and/or canonical correlation analysis. Machine-learning algorithms may include naïve Bayes methods. Machine-learning algorithms may include algorithms based on decision trees, such as decision tree classification or regression algorithms. Machine-learning algorithms may include ensemble methods such as bagging meta-estimator, forest of randomized tress, AdaBoost, gradient tree boosting, and/or voting classifier methods. Machine-learning algorithms may include neural net algorithms, including convolutional neural net processes.

Now referring to FIG. 6 , a method 600 for contingent assignment actions is shown. Step 605 of method 600 includes identifying assignment data, wherein assignment data represents an assignment. This may be implemented as disclosed with references to FIGS. 1-5 above. Assignment data may be generated by an inner circle member. An inner circle member may be a parent.

Step 610 of method 600 includes assigning the assignment to a user. This may be implemented as disclosed with references to FIGS. 1-5 above. In an embodiment, an inner circle member may determine who to assign the assignment to.

Step 615 of method 600 includes generating a contingent action as a function of the assignment data. This may be implemented as disclosed with references to FIGS. 1-5 above. Generating a contingent action may include generating a cryptographic commitment to the assignment data and the contingent action. Contingent action may be stored on an immutable sequential listing.

Step 620 includes receiving a cryptographic proof of a pairing of the assignment with a completion datum. This may be implemented as disclosed with references to FIGS. 1-5 above.

Step 625 of method 600 includes validating the cryptographic proof. Validating the cryptographic proof includes receiving validation data from a validator. A validator may be selected using a cryptanalysis protocol. A validator may be authenticated. A validator may be authenticated by encrypting the evidence. The evidence may only be decrypted by the “true” validator, as in, the validator with the decryption key. This may be implemented as disclosed with references to FIGS. 1-5 above.

Step 630 of method 600 includes executing the contingent action as a function of the validated cryptographic proof. This may be implemented as disclosed with references to FIGS. 1-5 above. In an embodiment, the contingent action may be executed on a schedule, which may be determined by inner circle member. Execution of the contingent action may also include storing the action on an immutable sequential listing. Execution of the contingent action may include payment to the user for completing the assignment. This may be implemented as disclosed with references to FIGS. 1-5 above.

It is to be noted that any one or more of the aspects and embodiments described herein may be conveniently implemented using one or more machines (e.g., one or more computing devices that are utilized as a user computing device for an electronic document, one or more server devices, such as a document server, etc.) programmed according to the teachings of the present specification, as will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the computer art. Appropriate software coding can readily be prepared by skilled programmers based on the teachings of the present disclosure, as will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the software art. Aspects and implementations discussed above employing software and/or software modules may also include appropriate hardware for assisting in the implementation of the machine executable instructions of the software and/or software module.

Such software may be a computer program product that employs a machine-readable storage medium. A machine-readable storage medium may be any medium that is capable of storing and/or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by a machine (e.g., a computing device) and that causes the machine to perform any one of the methodologies and/or embodiments described herein. Examples of a machine-readable storage medium include, but are not limited to, a magnetic disk, an optical disc (e.g., CD, CD-R, DVD, DVD-R, etc.), a magneto-optical disk, a read-only memory “ROM” device, a random access memory “RAM” device, a magnetic card, an optical card, a solid-state memory device, an EPROM, an EEPROM, and any combinations thereof. A machine-readable medium, as used herein, is intended to include a single medium as well as a collection of physically separate media, such as, for example, a collection of compact discs or one or more hard disk drives in combination with a computer memory. As used herein, a machine-readable storage medium does not include transitory forms of signal transmission.

Such software may also include information (e.g., data) carried as a data signal on a data carrier, such as a carrier wave. For example, machine-executable information may be included as a data-carrying signal embodied in a data carrier in which the signal encodes a sequence of instruction, or portion thereof, for execution by a machine (e.g., a computing device) and any related information (e.g., data structures and data) that causes the machine to perform any one of the methodologies and/or embodiments described herein.

Examples of a computing device include, but are not limited to, an electronic book reading device, a computer workstation, a terminal computer, a server computer, a handheld device (e.g., a tablet computer, a smartphone, etc.), a web appliance, a network router, a network switch, a network bridge, any machine capable of executing a sequence of instructions that specify an action to be taken by that machine, and any combinations thereof. In one example, a computing device may include and/or be included in a kiosk.

FIG. 7 shows a diagrammatic representation of one embodiment of a computing device in the exemplary form of a computer system 700 within which a set of instructions for causing a control system to perform any one or more of the aspects and/or methodologies of the present disclosure may be executed. It is also contemplated that multiple computing devices may be utilized to implement a specially configured set of instructions for causing one or more of the devices to perform any one or more of the aspects and/or methodologies of the present disclosure. Computer system 700 includes a processor 704 and a memory 708 that communicate with each other, and with other components, via a bus 712. Bus 712 may include any of several types of bus structures including, but not limited to, a memory bus, a memory controller, a peripheral bus, a local bus, and any combinations thereof, using any of a variety of bus architectures.

Processor 704 may include any suitable processor, such as without limitation a processor incorporating logical circuitry for performing arithmetic and logical operations, such as an arithmetic and logic unit (ALU), which may be regulated with a state machine and directed by operational inputs from memory and/or sensors; processor 704 may be organized according to Von Neumann and/or Harvard architecture as a non-limiting example. Processor 704 may include, incorporate, and/or be incorporated in, without limitation, a microcontroller, microprocessor, digital signal processor (DSP), Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), Complex Programmable Logic Device (CPLD), Graphical Processing Unit (GPU), general purpose GPU, Tensor Processing Unit (TPU), analog or mixed signal processor, Trusted Platform Module (TPM), a floating point unit (FPU), and/or system on a chip (SoC).

Memory 708 may include various components (e.g., machine-readable media) including, but not limited to, a random-access memory component, a read only component, and any combinations thereof. In one example, a basic input/output system 716 (BIOS), including basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer system 700, such as during start-up, may be stored in memory 708. Memory 708 may also include (e.g., stored on one or more machine-readable media) instructions (e.g., software) 720 embodying any one or more of the aspects and/or methodologies of the present disclosure. In another example, memory 708 may further include any number of program modules including, but not limited to, an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, program data, and any combinations thereof.

Computer system 700 may also include a storage device 724. Examples of a storage device (e.g., storage device 724) include, but are not limited to, a hard disk drive, a magnetic disk drive, an optical disc drive in combination with an optical medium, a solid-state memory device, and any combinations thereof. Storage device 724 may be connected to bus 712 by an appropriate interface (not shown). Example interfaces include, but are not limited to, SCSI, advanced technology attachment (ATA), serial ATA, universal serial bus (USB), IEEE 1394 (FIREWIRE), and any combinations thereof. In one example, storage device 724 (or one or more components thereof) may be removably interfaced with computer system 700 (e.g., via an external port connector (not shown)). Particularly, storage device 724 and an associated machine-readable medium 728 may provide nonvolatile and/or volatile storage of machine-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, and/or other data for computer system 700. In one example, software 720 may reside, completely or partially, within machine-readable medium 728. In another example, software 720 may reside, completely or partially, within processor 704.

Computer system 700 may also include an input device 732. In one example, a user of computer system 700 may enter commands and/or other information into computer system 700 via input device 732. Examples of an input device 732 include, but are not limited to, an alpha-numeric input device (e.g., a keyboard), a pointing device, a joystick, a gamepad, an audio input device (e.g., a microphone, a voice response system, etc.), a cursor control device (e.g., a mouse), a touchpad, an optical scanner, a video capture device (e.g., a still camera, a video camera), a touchscreen, and any combinations thereof. Input device 732 may be interfaced to bus 712 via any of a variety of interfaces (not shown) including, but not limited to, a serial interface, a parallel interface, a game port, a USB interface, a FIREWIRE interface, a direct interface to bus 712, and any combinations thereof. Input device 732 may include a touch screen interface that may be a part of or separate from display 736, discussed further below. Input device 732 may be utilized as a user selection device for selecting one or more graphical representations in a graphical interface as described above.

A user may also input commands and/or other information to computer system 700 via storage device 724 (e.g., a removable disk drive, a flash drive, etc.) and/or network interface device 740. A network interface device, such as network interface device 740, may be utilized for connecting computer system 700 to one or more of a variety of networks, such as network 744, and one or more remote devices 748 connected thereto. Examples of a network interface device include, but are not limited to, a network interface card (e.g., a mobile network interface card, a LAN card), a modem, and any combination thereof. Examples of a network include, but are not limited to, a wide area network (e.g., the Internet, an enterprise network), a local area network (e.g., a network associated with an office, a building, a campus or other relatively small geographic space), a telephone network, a data network associated with a telephone/voice provider (e.g., a mobile communications provider data and/or voice network), a direct connection between two computing devices, and any combinations thereof. A network, such as network 744, may employ a wired and/or a wireless mode of communication. In general, any network topology may be used. Information (e.g., data, software 720, etc.) may be communicated to and/or from computer system 700 via network interface device 740.

Computer system 700 may further include a video display adapter 752 for communicating a displayable image to a display device, such as display device 736. Examples of a display device include, but are not limited to, a liquid crystal display (LCD), a cathode ray tube (CRT), a plasma display, a light emitting diode (LED) display, and any combinations thereof. Display adapter 752 and display device 736 may be utilized in combination with processor 704 to provide graphical representations of aspects of the present disclosure. In addition to a display device, computer system 700 may include one or more other peripheral output devices including, but not limited to, an audio speaker, a printer, and any combinations thereof. Such peripheral output devices may be connected to bus 712 via a peripheral interface 756. Examples of a peripheral interface include, but are not limited to, a serial port, a USB connection, a FIREWIRE connection, a parallel connection, and any combinations thereof.

The foregoing has been a detailed description of illustrative embodiments of the invention. Various modifications and additions can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention. Features of each of the various embodiments described above may be combined with features of other described embodiments as appropriate in order to provide a multiplicity of feature combinations in associated new embodiments. Furthermore, while the foregoing describes a number of separate embodiments, what has been described herein is merely illustrative of the application of the principles of the present invention. Additionally, although particular methods herein may be illustrated and/or described as being performed in a specific order, the ordering is highly variable within ordinary skill to achieve methods, systems, and software according to the present disclosure. Accordingly, this description is meant to be taken only by way of example, and not to otherwise limit the scope of this invention.

Exemplary embodiments have been disclosed above and illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes, omissions and additions may be made to that which is specifically disclosed herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. 

What is claimed is:
 1. An apparatus for contingent assignment actions, the apparatus comprising: at least a processor; and a memory communicatively connected to the at least a processor, the memory containing instructions configuring the at least a processor to: identify assignment data, wherein the assignment data represents an assignment; assign the assignment to a user; generate a contingent action as a function of the assignment data wherein the contingent action further comprises a contingent payment posted to an immutable sequential listing using a secure proof that is authorized with a digital signature created using a private key; receive a cryptographic proof of a pairing of the assignment with a completion datum; validate the cryptographic proof; and execute the contingent action as a function of the validated cryptographic proof.
 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the assignment data is generated by an inner circle member.
 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein generating the contingent action further comprises generating a cryptographic commitment to the assignment data and the contingent action.
 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein validating the cryptographic proof comprises receiving a validation data from a validator.
 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the memory contains instructions further configuring the at least a processor to select the validator using a cryptanalysis protocol.
 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the memory contains instructions further configuring the at least a processor to store the contingent action on an immutable sequential listing.
 7. The apparatus of claim 1, executing the contingent action comprises executing on a schedule.
 8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the schedule is set by an inner circle member.
 9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the memory contains instructions further configuring the at least a processor to authenticate a validator of the assignment.
 10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein authenticating the validator comprises encrypting the completion of the assignment and decrypting by a decryption key.
 11. A method for contingent assignment actions, the method comprising: identifying, by a processor, assignment data, wherein the assignment data represents an assignment; assigning, by the processor, the assignment to a user; generating, by the processor, a contingent action as a function of the assignment data, wherein the contingent action further comprises a contingent payment posted to an immutable sequential listing using a secure proof that is authorized with a digital signature created using a private key; receiving, by the processor, a cryptographic proof of a pairing of the assignment with a completion datum; validating, by the processor, the cryptographic proof; and executing, by the processor, the contingent action as a function of the validated cryptographic proof.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the assignment data is generated by an inner circle member.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein generating the contingent action further comprises generating a cryptographic commitment to the assignment data and the contingent action.
 14. The method of claim 11, wherein validating the cryptographic proof comprises receiving validation data from a validator.
 15. The method of claim 11, wherein the memory contains instructions further configuring the at least a processor to select the validator using a cryptanalysis protocol.
 16. The method of claim 11, wherein the memory contains instructions further configuring the at least a processor to store the contingent action on an immutable sequential listing.
 17. The method of claim 11, executing the contingent action comprises executing on a schedule.
 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the schedule is set by an inner circle member.
 19. The method of claim 11, wherein the memory contains instructions further configuring the at least a processor to authenticate a validator of the assignment.
 20. The method of claim 19, wherein authenticating the validator comprises encrypting the completion of the assignment and decrypting by a decryption key. 